Church News - The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Prop. 8 upheld in California

Published: Saturday, May 30, 2009

E-mail story

It's easy. Send a link to the story you were just reading to a friend. Just fill out the form on this page and we'll send it along.

Your name and e-mail address are transmitted to the recipient. Otherwise, it is considered private information; see Privacy policy.

California's Supreme Court rejected a constitutional challenge to Proposition 8 on May 26 in a 6-1 decision.

Proposition 8 — the initiative measure adopted by California voters in a Nov. 4, 2008, election — added a section to the California Constitution providing "only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."

In the decision, written by Chief Justice Ron George, the court rejected arguments that the ban on gay marriage was such a fundamental change in the California Constitution that it first needed the Legislature's approval.

The Church issued on May 26 the following statement following the decision:

"Today's decision by the California Supreme Court is welcome. The issue the court decided was whether California citizens validly exercised their right to amend their own constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman. The court has overwhelmingly affirmed their action.

"The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints recognizes the deeply held feelings on both sides, but strongly affirms its belief that marriage should be between a man and a woman. The bedrock institution of marriage between a man and a woman has profound implications for our society. These implications range from what our children are taught in schools to individual and collective freedom of religious expression and practice.

"Accordingly, the Church stands firmly for what it believes is right for the health and well-being of society as a whole. In doing so, it once again affirms that all of us are children of God, and all deserve to be treated with respect. The Church believes that serious discussion of these issues is not helped when extreme elements on both sides of the debate demonize the other."